Goldsmiths: MFA 2007 Survey
August 29, 2006- September 16, 2006
Reception: August 30, 6:00 pm - 8:00 pm
525 W 26th St
MFA 2007 Survey produced by Cottelston Advisors. Curated by Jennifer Thatcher.
____
Goldsmiths: MFA 2007 Survey
Performances
In conjunction with the preview of the exhibition Goldsmiths: MFA
2007 Survey, Cottelston Advisors will be presenting the following suite
of performances on the evening of August 30, 2006, from 6-8pm.
Shoot the Moon: A musical performance piece commissioned by Robb
Jamieson, the song expounds the virtues of Rock n’ Roll over
Contemporary Art. The band consists of Daniel Schacter on lead guitar
and vocals and on drums Tara Martin. Robb will be stage crashing.
Title: Contemporary Art. Duration: 4 minutes.
Dr. Polly Fibre: A graduate of Goldsmiths Postgraduate School of
Textiles, Christine Ellison aka Dr. Polly Fibre builds a soundscape of
rhythms and texture from the peripheries of tailoring. The sonic
seamstress collapses binaries through this exploration of authenticity,
progress and craft in an age of post-digital aesthetics.
Title: CRAFTWORK VIII: 4/4 time. Duration: 12 minutes.
ORTHO: ORTHO is a performance noise ensemble made up of Clay
Lacefield, Kyle Lapidus, Nouri Zander with sound and technical support
by Ron Rosenman. Using handmade costumes, props, and electronic
instruments they tell tales and espouse scientific theories. ORTHO will
change your life!
Title: This Island ORTHO. Duration: 13 minutes.
____
Goldsmiths College is the most notorious art school in
Britain. Famously the birthplace of the Young British Artists
in the late1980s, Goldsmiths invented the very idea
of the celebrity art school for a celebrity-obsessed era.
Lazy art critics, curators, and collectors were suddenly
motivated to venture into deepest south London for
Goldsmiths degree shows. Quick: get down there before
Charles Saatchi snaps everything up! Quick: Find the art
stars of tomorrow – then drop them just as soon as the
next year graduates!
Not much has changed. If the ever-growing warren
of artist-run spaces and young gallerists in
London’s trendy East End has provided another
arena in which to see young artists’ work, art colleges
are still the most convenient means by which
critics and curators can take the temperature of the
current contemporary art scene. And Goldsmiths still
reigns supreme: its degree shows are bigger, bolder,
and more exhausting than any other in Britain.
Saatchi still sniffs about.
Yet if the excitement and laboratory atmosphere still
prevail at Goldsmiths, the insecurity that until recently
accompanied the here-today-gone-tomorrow London
art scene is thankfully dissipating. Today’s new crop of
Goldsmiths artists can look forward to a postgraduate
future where there are endless spaces in which to exhibit,
an expanding cluster of art fairs to seduce collectors,
and a general public less hostile to contemporary
art; a culture that is more interested in nurturing young
artists than continually replacing them. Moreover, now
that its infrastructure is fully established, the new London
art scene can afford to be more international in its
outlook, in direct contrast to the insularity of the YBAs.
This new openness, maturity, and con. dence are everywhere
evident in the work of this year’s best Goldsmiths
MFA students, whose nationalities include Greek, Icelandic,
American, Japanese, and Germany.
While a do-it-yourself aesthetic has for the past
couple of decades been the hallmark of British sculpture,
the new sculpture boasts the skills of the expert welder
or joiner, the result of days laboring in the foundry.
Richard Clements and Ryan O’Connor make heavy
robust sculptures that both revel in a seemingly oldfashioned
notion of masculinity and question the
starkness of the Modernist macho aesthetic. A hybrid of
classic 20th-century furniture design and surrealist sculpture,
an O’Connor chair, for example, might answer the
Modernist quest to balance form and function, did it not
appear to be growing branches. Clements works rather
in the mid-point between the urban and the rural; he
examines our relationship to the natural and what forms
these interactions create. His wrought iron sculptures
Fountain and its companion piece and its companion piece Decoy, an elegant an elegant Decoy
swan-shaped garden ornament, celebrate the non-institutionalized
freedom of rural aesthetics.
If Modernism was obsessed with the idea of a sleek
technotopia,
Sonia Morange prefers the behind-thescenes
messiness of our gadget-obsessed society; she
paints electrical wires. With her expressionistic style
and jewel-colored palette she brings a nostalgic, sometimes
even erotic, whimsy to her still lives of tangled bundles
of wires and the untidy backs of computer monitors.
Christopher Paquet, on the other hand, mixes high
Modernism with folkloric allegory in his imposing diptych
The Power of the Majesty, in which a stag rises in which a stag rises Majesty
proudly from a fairytale woodland scene. Curtained on
either side by heavy black brushstrokes, the scene hovers
precariously between utopian and dystopian.
Maria-Brigita Karantzi’s and and Karantzi’ Guðni Gunnarsson’s
installations use the technique of magic realism to lure
the viewer into an Alice in Wonderland world of topsyturvy
scale and puzzling philosophical conundrums.
Karantzi’s miniature sculpture Impossible
features two features two ladders over a dollop of blue paint; leaning against each
other, the only route over the paint-mountain is to climb
up one impossibly steep ladder, over the top and down
the other. Her mischief continues in Shit!
in which a tiny in which a tiny . gurine stands next to an over. owing toilet; surrounded
by a string of festive fairy lights, hers is a cruel shrine
to the unfortunate man’s bowel disorder. Both artists
have a magpie’s eye for the discarded and unloved gems
– scraps of mirror, shiny bin bags – of our consumer society;
Gunnarsson recycled an entire abandoned house
in his native Reykjavik.
The fragile male ego is explored in the videos of
Emanuel Almborg, Raymond Taudin-Chabot, and
Robb Jamieson, and in the paintings of Erin Crowe.
Taudin-Chabot creates meticulously choreographed
existentialist tableaux of contemporary businessmen.
His films study the almost imperceptible maneuvers that
men perform to signal or attempt to improve on their position
in the of. ce pecking order. Moving as slowly and
deliberately as a Bill Viola video, the men anxiously scrutinize
their stress-worn re. ections in the of. ce bathroom
mirror or studiously avoid each other’s predatory gazes.
Erin Crowe paints portraits of those whose egos
require constant af. rmation; she preys mainly on
businessmen and politicians. If on some occasions
Crowe’s adulation of male authority . gures might
suggest the psychopathology of a deluded fan, on
others she plays the role of the of. cial corporate portraitist.
Her winsome charm and perfect timing have
even made her a minor celebrity: she was invited
to be the CNBC artist in residence when the news
station was unable to interview the reclusive Federal
Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan on the day of his
retirement. For this exhibition, Crowe turns her disarmingly
. attering eye on Fidel Castro and the philanthropist
Warren Buffet.
Emanuel Almborg and
Robb Jamieson look rather to
the insecurities of the young Western male. Part docudrama,
part animation, Almborg’s film Major
takes the vie- takes the vie- wer on a labyrinthine trip through the fantasy world of a
teenager, who, with his imaginary alter-ego, attempts to
escape the stifing ennui of middle-class family life. As the
film shifts perspective, however, we watch his parents
battle with their own frustrations at the stubbornness
and hostility of their son. Performed by actors, Major
was in fact made in collaboration with a real family, who
helped write the . ctional script to try and tackle
their very real issues.
One of
Robb Jamieson’s films asks us to believe that
the artist is playing the guitar for the very . rst time.
Strutting and strumming away in front of the camera
with all the attitude of a seasoned lead guitarist, it takes
a while to register that he really is playing badly.
Many young male artists make punky films that express
their teenage musical af. liations, but, in its earnestness,
Jamieson’s film is unexpectedly touching. In predetermining
his failure to play well, moreover – the title of the
film reveals that this is the . rst and last
time he will play time he will play – Jamieson seeks once and for all to kill many an artist’s
secret dream of becoming a rock star. Music might be
more appealing than contemporary art, Jamieson suggests,
but it also takes a lot of hard work to become a
musician, so better stick to what you’re good at.
Jeanine Woollard, recently awarded the Beck’s
Futures Student Bursary, also tries an impatient hand at an
activity that would more usually require several years of
dedication to perfect: fencing. In one gallery performance,
she enlists her father, whose workingclass
background sits at odds with the aristocratic
heritage of this sport, into training a group of
artists. A Charlie Chaplin-style soundtrack over
the documentary footage underlines the slapstick
potential of the sport, and the absurdity of its being played
inside a white cube gallery with inadequately protective
out. ts made by Woollard herself. Another film,
Kiss Fencing, aims to capture fencing’s original context, aims to capture fencing’s original context, Fencing
the medieval courtly love tradition. Here, Woollard and
her fencing partner substitute kisses for swords; trying
to score pecks, the . ght looks more like an elaborate
bird mating ritual. Woollard is a post-feminist Romantic
artist: she’d like a man to pick up her handkerchief after
her, but if necessary she’ll get her hands dirty too.
If Woollard’s films resurrect an archaic British identity,
in contrast to the Britpop cool of the YBAs,
Yuko Kamei
addresses the dif. culty for a foreigner of establishing
a British identity. Kitaika
tells the story of a Chinese tells the story of a Chinese girl whose name, Aowen, is unpronounceable not only
to her new English compatriots, but also, as an ancient
Chinese name meaning the charming ‘. ying in literature’,
is equally problematic in her birth country. Finally
settling on the name ‘Kitaika’ (Chinese girl), given her by
her husband’s Bulgarian grandmother, she graciously
resigns herself to remaining a perpetual foreigner.
Finally,
Sarah Gilder’s Baywatch
satirizes another satirizes another pervasive stereotype: the all-American ideal of the buxom
blonde beauty. Her version of the cult soft-porn TV series
swaps the golden sands of Santa Monica for the grey
environs of an anonymous suburban street. Shivering
slightly in her swimsuit on the wet street corner, Gilder’s
Baywatch
babe readies herself for a rather different babe readies herself for a rather different type of surf-wave, a drenching by a passing car.
-- Jennifer Thatcher
Books and DVDs related to artists in this show| Location | | | Gallery | White Box | | Address | 525 W 26th St New York (Chelsea) NY, 10001 United States | | Phone | 212-714-2347 | | Fax | 212-714-2354 | | Hours | Tue-Sat 11-6 | |
| |
|